Fiziol. rast. genet. 2022, vol. 54, no. 5, 450-459, doi:

Features of the impact of low temperatures on Actinidia arguta

Rudnyk-Ivashchenko O.I.1,2, Tsandur M.M.1, Schwartau V.V.2

  1. Institute of Horticulture National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine  23, Sadova St., Novosilky, Kyiv Region, 03027, Ukraine
  2. Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine  31/17 Vasylkivska St., Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine

For the formation of food security in Ukraine and the world, it is important to increase the productivity of major crops — wheat, corn, sunflower, etc., as well as to ensure the presence of sufficient quantities of minerals and vitamins in human nutrition through the introduction of Actinidia fruit species. The limiting factor of widespread introduction of Actinidia species is limited frost resistance. In order to determine the peculiarities of the influence of low temperatures (—20, —25, —30 °C), their influence on the structural parts of the shoots: bark, cambium, wood, heartwood — of two forms of French selection — female (two forms) and male (one) was established. It was shown that the aboveground parts of plants of both forms of culture show sensitivity to low temperatures, but the most vulnerable in the experiment were the parenchymal core tissues of the shoot, which form a pool of assimilates to ensure plant development and the formation of generative organs. In the experiment, male Actinidia plants were more resistant to low temperatures. Their level of resistance in total was 3.0—3.3 points higher compared to the varieties of female forms, in which the corresponding figure in variant 4 was 37.0, and 37.6. The highest level of damage (3.8 points) in the female form was observed in the variety Isai in the same variant (—30 °C) on cuts through the bud. It was found that plants of any variety, which were in the experiment, did not suffer the highest degree of damage — 6 points, at which there is a complete death, which indicates their endurance under growing conditions in the research area of the region of Ukraine. The results of laboratory studies of frost resistance of A. arguta forms indicate the possibility of widespread introduction of this species in the southern regions of Ukraine.

Keywords: frost resistance, laboratory freezing, shoots, buds, critical tissue damage

Fiziol. rast. genet.
2022, vol. 54, no. 5, 450-459

Full text and supplemented materials

Free full text: PDF  


1. Morgun, V.V. & Rybalka, O.I. (2017). Strategy of cereals genetic improvement aimed at food safety, health promotion and industry needs. Visn. Nac. Acad. Nauk Ukr., 3, pp. 54-64. [in Ukrainian].

2. Morgun, V.V. & Kots, S.Ya. (2021). Contribution of scientists of the Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics of NAS of Ukraine in the development of biological science and economy of the country. Fiziol. rast. genet., 53, No. 2, pp. 95-111. [in Ukrainian].

3. Stonehouse, W., Gammon, C.S., Beck, K.L., Conlon, C.A., Von Hurst, P.R. & Kruger, R. (2013). Kiwifruit: our daily prescription for health. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 91(6), pp. 442-447.

4. Zaimenko, N.V., Skrypchenko, N.V., Ivanytska, B.O., Klymchuk, D.O., Novychenko, N.S. & Liu, D. (2020). The effect of soil and climatic conditions on the distribution of nutrients in Actinidia arguta leaves. Biosystems Diversity, 28(1), pp. 113-118.

5. Li, Y.F., Jiang, W., Liu, C., Fu, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, M., Chen, C., Guo, L., Zhuang, Q.G. & Liu, Z.B. (2021). Comparison of fruit morphology and nutrition metabolism in different cultivars of kiwifruit across developmental stages. Peer J., 9, p. e11538.

6. Ferguson, A.R. (1984). Kiwifruit: a botanical review. Hortic. Rev., 6, pp. 1-64.

7. Sale, P.R. (1990). Kiwifruit Growing. Crown Copyright Reserved: New Zealand, Wellington.

8. Blanchet, P. (1985). Frost damage to kiwi (Actinidia sinensis Pl.): risks to the French orchards. Arboriculture Fruitiere. Arboriculture-Fruitiere (France), 370, p. 43-48.

9. Dozier, W.A., Jr., Caylor, A.W., Himelrick, D.G. & Powell, A.A. (1992). Cold protection of kiwi fruit plants with trunk wraps and microsprinkler irrigation. HortScience, 27, pp. 977-979.

10. Nanos, G.D., Sfakiotakis, E.M., Boufidis, C. & Tsitouridis, K. (1997). Frost damage and protection of kiwi vines. Acta Hortic., 444, pp. 233-236.

11. Hewett, E.W. & Young, K. (1981). Critical freeze damage temperatures of flower buds of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch.). N. Z. J. Agr. Res., 24, pp. 73-75.

12. Palonen, P. & Buszard, D. (1997). Current state of cold hardiness research on fruit crops. Can. J. Plant Sci., 77, pp. 399-420.

13. Yu, D.J. & Lee, H.J. (2020). Evaluation of freezing injury in temperate fruit trees. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol., 61, pp. 787-794.

14. Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine. (2021). Results of the World Bank study «Building climate resilience in agriculture and forestry», Ukraine.

15. Avery, J. (1991). Actinidia. Annu. Rpt., Northern Nut Growers Assn., 82, pp. 175-179.

16. Sun, S., Qi, X., Wang, R., Lin, M. & Fang, J. (2020). Evaluation of freezing tolerance in Actinidia germplasm based on relative electrolyte leakage. Horticult., Environm.t Biotechnol., 61, 4, pp. 755-765.

17. Quamme, H.A. (1978). Breeding and selecting temperate fruit crops for cold hardiness, pp. 313-332. In: Liand, P.H. & Sakai A. (Eds.). Plant cold hardiness and freezing stress: Mechanisms and crop implications. Academic Press, NewYork.

18. Chat, J. (1995). Cold hardiness within the Genus Actinidia. Hort Sci., 30(2), pp. 329-332.

19. Bublik, M.O., Patyka, T.I. & Kitaev, O.I. (2013). Laboratory and field methods for determining the frost resistance of fruit species and crops (guidelines). Kyiv: NAAS of Ukraine, Institute of Horticulture NAAS [in Ukrainian].

20. Grokholsky, V.V. Potanin, D.V., Kitaev, O.I. & Bublik, M.O. (2008). Field methods for determining frost resistance of fruit species. Gardening: interdisciplinary thematic scientific collection., 61, pp. 277-291 [in Ukrainian].

21. Palonen, P. & Buszard, D. (1997). Current state of cold hard in essresearchon fruit crops. Can. J. Plant Sci., 77, pp. 399-420.