The efficiency of adjuvant AGNS 1056-X joint application with herbicide formulations from a group of graminicides Fusilade Forte and Agil, the active substances of which are aryloxyphenoxy propionic acid (AOPPA) derivatives, was investigated in pot and field experiments. In pot experiment winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants were used as a model of annual grass weeds. To determine the effect of moisture on the phytotoxic effect of graminicides, in pot experiment artificial drought was created by stopping plants watering. In field experiments, the efficiency of certain grass weed species control, in particular yellow foxtail (Setaria glauca (L.) Pal. Beauv.) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Pal. Beauv.), was determined. Estimation of fresh or dry weigth of plants aboveground part and in some experiments the total content of chlorophyll in the leaves was used for evaluation of the phytotoxic effects of herbicides or the efficiency of weeds control. Studies have shown that the addition of adjuvant AGNS 1056-X accelerates the development of the phytotoxic effect of graminicides Fusilade Forte and Agil. The development of graminicides phytotoxic effect accelerated more by addition of adjuvant AGNS 1056-X in drought conditions when grass weeds were in a state of water stress. Although in some cases, joint application with adjuvant AGNS 1056-X led to increase of grass weeds control by graminicides, the addition of the adjuvant does not guarantee increased protection efficiency. In this regard, the joint use of graminicides with adjuvant AGNS 1056-X does not allow to reduce the rate of graminicides. To achieve high crop protection efficiency, the graminicides rate should be chosen taking into account the level of weed infestation, stage of weed development and environmental conditions, regardless of whether or not graminicides will be used in conjunction with the adjuvant.
Keywords: herbicides, graminicides, adjuvants, phytotoxic action, weed control, drought
Full text and suplimented materialsFree full text: PDF
1. Storchous, I. (2016). The protection of the buckwheat from weeds: domestic and foreign experience. Propozytsia, 14.01.2016 Retrieved from https://propozitsiya.com/ua/zahist-grechki-vid-buryaniv-vitchiznyaniy-ta-zarubizhniy-dosvid [in Ukrainian].
2. National report on the state of the environment in Ukraine in 2011 (2012). Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine. K.: LAT & Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
3. Zabkiewicz, J.A. (2000). Adjuvant and herbicidal efficacy - present status and future prospects. Weed Res., 40, No. 1, pp. 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00172.x
4. Morderer, Ye.Yu. & Merezhinsky, Yu.G. (2009). Herbicides. Vol. 1. Mechanisms of action and practice. Kyiv: Logos [in Ukrainian].
5. Bunting, J.A., Sprague, Ch.L. & Riechers, D.E. (2004). Proper adjuvant selection for foramsulfuron activity. Crop Protection, 23, pp. 361-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.08.022
6. Storchous, I. (2014). The use of surfactants: why is it important? Agribusiness today, No. 18 (289), pp. 32-33 [in Ukrainian].
7. Anishin, S. (2016). Modern approaches to increasing the efficiency of plant protection products using innovative adjuvants. Agroscope. Agrarian intelligence technologies, Iss. 2, pp. 33-36.
8. AGNS 1056-X (2019). Retrieved from http://www.adjuvants.com.ua/products/electron-tm/
9. Boydstone, R.A. (1992). Drought stress reduction fluazifop-P activity on green foxtail. Weed Sci., 40, pp. 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500056885
10. Rossi, F.S., Tomaso, J.M. & Neal, J.C. (1993). Fate of fenoxaprop-ethyl applied to moisture-stressed smooth crabgrass (Digitaria ischaemum L.). Weed Sci., 41, pp. 335-340. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500052024
11. Radchenko, M., Sychuk, A. & Morderer, Ye. (2014). Decrease of the herbicide fenoxaprop phytotoxicity in the drought condition: the role of the antioxidant enzymatic system. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 54, No. 4, pp. 390-394. https://doi.org/10.2478/jppr-2014-0058
12. Semenova, I.N. (2015). Synoptic and climatic conditions of drought formation in Ukraine (Unpublished Doctoral thesis). Odessa State Ecological University, Odessa, Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
13. Sharma, S.D. & Singh, M. (2000). Optimizing foliar activity of glyphosate on Bidens frondosa and Panicum maximum with different adjuvant types. Weed Research, 40, No. 6, pp. 523-533. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00209.x
14. Spiridonov, Yu.Ya. & Nikitin, N.V. (2015).Glyphosate-containing herbicides - features of the technology of their application in the wide practice of crop production. Vestnik zashchity rasteniy, 4 (86), pp. 5-11 [in Russian].
15. Guralchuk, Zh.Z., Sychuk, A.M., Gumenyuk, O.V., Rodzevich, O.P., Grynyuk, S.O. & Morderer, Ye.Yu. (2017). Efficacy of weed control by different formulations of herbicide glyphosate depending on the quality of water and application of adjuvant companion gold. Fiziol. rast. genet., 2017, 49, No. 6, pp. 513-520 [in Ukranian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2017.06.513
16. Welburn, A.R. (1994). The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b as well as total carotenoids using various solvents with spectrophotometry of different resolution. J. Plant Physiol., 144, pp. 248-254 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2