en   ru   uk  
Fiziol. rast. genet. 2020, vol. 52, no. 3, 208-223, doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2020.03.208

Radiation use efficiency of winter wheat canopy during pre-anthesis growth

Priadkina G.O.1, Stasik O.O.1, Poliovyi A.M.2, Yarmolska O.E.2, Kuzmova K.3

  1. Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 31/17 Vasylkivska Str., Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine
  2. Odessa National Ecological University 15 Lvivska Str., Odessa, 65016, Ukraine
  3. Agricultural University 12 Mendeleev Av., Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria

The relationship between the photosynthetically active radiation use efficiency during the pre-anthesis period of ontogenesis and yield of winter wheat were studied in field experiments in years with dry weather conditions (2018 — during period of stem elongation—anthesis, 2019 — during the period of grain filling). The studies were conducted using 6 varieties of bread winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) originated from the Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Variety Smuhlianka is widely used high-yielding variety released in 2004, while the others 5 varieties — Hospodarka, Kyivska 17, Pochaina, Krasnopilka and Poradnytsia are more recently released (2017—2018). It has been established that, starting from the booting stage (GS 45), varieties can be divided into 2 groups differing in leaf area index: varieties Hospodarka, Kyivska 17 and Pochaina were 15—30 % superior than the varieties Krasnopilka, Smuhlianka and Poradnytsia. At the period from anthesis to milky-wax ripeness, the dry biomass growth rate in the first three varieties was also higher than in the last three. The radiation use efficiency (RUE) at the period of spring vegetation (stem elongation—booting) did not differ significantly between the varieties, whereas during the period booting—anthesis and anthesis—late milk ripeness, it was significantly higher in the varieties Hospodarka, Kyivska 17 and Pochaina than in other varieties. The first three varieties have also higher grain yield in both years: 8.60—8.72 in 2018 and 9.15—9.78 t/ha in 2019, while in the varieties Krasnopilka, Smuhlianka and Poradnytsia yield varied in the range of 7.12—7.85 and 7.85—8.48 t/ha, respectively. A positive correlation was found between the RUE in certain periods of pre-anthesis development and grain yield, and the grain number per 1 m2, with the exception for the period of stem elongation—booting. The greater efficiency of converting light energy into biomass at the period before anthesis contributes to increasing wheat grain productivity that is associated with a higher rate of above-ground biomass accumulation at the period before flowering and larger number of grains per square meter of soil. These data supported suggestion that a higher RUE during the pre-anthesis growth period may be considered as an important determinant of high wheat productivity and may be used as a potential breeding criterion for high wheat productivity.

Keywords: Triticum aestivum L., radiation use efficiency, pre-anthesis biomass accumulation, productivity

Fiziol. rast. genet.
2020, vol. 52, no. 3, 208-223

Full text and suplimented materials

Free full text: PDF  


1. Monteith, J.L. & Moss, C.J. (1977). Climate and the Efficiency of Crop Production in Britain. Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 281, No. 980, pp. 277-294. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1977.0140

2. Zhu, X.G., Long, S.P. & Ort, D.R. (2008). What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass? Curr. Opin. Biotech., 19, No. 2, pp. 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2008.02.004

3. Kiriziy, D.A., Stasik, O.O., Priadkina, G.O. & Shadchina, T.M. (2014). Photosynthesis: CO2 assimilation and mechanisms of its regulation. Vol. 2. Kyiv: Logos [in Russian].

4. Tooming, H.G. (1984). Ecological principles of maximum crop productivity. Leningrad: Hydrometeoizdat [in Russian].

5. Duan, J., Wu, Y., Zhou, Y., Ren, X., Shao, Y., Feng, W., Zhu, Y., He, L. & Guo, T. (2018). Approach to Higher Wheat Yield in the Huang-Huai Plain: Improving Post-anthesis Productivity to Increase Harvest Index. Front Plant Sci., Oct 23, 9: 1457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01457

6. Chen, X-X., Zhang, W., Liang, X-Y., Liu, Y-M., Xu, S.-J., Zhao, Q-Y., Du, Y-F., Zhang, L., Chen, X-P. & Zou, C-Q. (2019). Physiological and developmental traits associated with the grain yield of winter wheat as affected by phosphorus fertilizer management. Sci. Rep., 9, No. 1, p. 16580. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53000-z

7. Austin, R.B. (1980). Physiological limitation to cereal yields and ways of reducing them by breeding. In: Hurd, R.C., Biscoe, P.V. & Dennis, C. (Eds.). (pp. 3-19), Opportunities for Increasing Crop Yields. London: Pitman Publishing.

8. Morales, F., Ancin, M., Fakhet, D., Gonzalez-Torralba, J., Gamez, A.L., Seminario, A., Soba, D., Mariem, S.B., Garriga, M. & Aranjuelo, I. (2020). Photosynthetic metabolism under stressful growth conditions as a bases for crop breeding and yield improvement. Plants, 9, 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9010088

9. Slattery, R.A. & Ort, D.R. (2015). Photosynthetic energy conversion efficiency: setting a baseline for gauging future improvements in important food and biofuel crops. Plant Physiol., 168, No. 2, pp. 383-392. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00066

10. Pradhan, S., Sehgal, V.K., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., Panigrahi, P., Parihar, C.M. & Jat, S.L. (2018). Radiation interception, extinction coefficient and use efficiency of wheat crop at various irrigation and nitrogen levels in a semi-arid location. Indian J. Plant Physiol., 23, No. 3, pp. 416-425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-018-0400-x

11. Priadkina, G.O., Stasik, O.O., Kapitanska, O.S., Yarmolska, O.E. & Tsucrenko, N.V. (2019). Efficiency of use of photosynthetically active radiation in winter wheat crops. The Bull. Kharkiv Nationl. Agrarian Univ. Series Biology, 1, No. 46, pp. 23-34 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.35550/vbio2019.01.023

12. Hussain, A., Chaudhry, R.M., Wajid, A., Ahmad, A., Ibrahim, M. & Goheer, A.R. (2004). Influence of water stress on growth, yield and radiation use efficiency of various wheat cultivars. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 6, No. 6, pp. 1074-1079. 1560-8530/2004/06-6-1074-1079

13. Estrada-Campuzano, G., Slafer, G.A. & Miralles, D.J. (2012). Differences in yield, biomass and their components between triticale and wheat grown under contrasting water and nitrogen environments. Field Crops Res., 128, pp. 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.01.003

14. Shearman, V.J., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Scott, R.K. & Foulkes, M.J. (2005). Physiological processes associated with wheat yield progress in the UK. Crop Sci., 45, pp. 175-185. https:/ doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0175

15. Sadras, V.O., Lawson, C. & Montoro, A. (2012). Photosynthetic traits in Australian wheat varieties released between 1958 and 2007. Field Crops Res., 134, pp. 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.04.012

16. Acreche, M., Sanchez, M.J.A., Briceno-Felix, G. & Slafer, G.A. (2009). Radiation interception and use efficiency as affected by breeding in Mediterranean wheat. Field Crops Res., 110, No. 2, pp. 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.07.005

17. Okami, M., Matsunaka, H., Fujita, M., Nakamura, K. & Nishio, Z. (2016). Analysis of yield-attributing traits for high-yielding wheat lines in southwestern Japan. Plant Prod. Sci., 19, No. 3, pp. 360-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2016.1151331

18. Morhun, V.V., Sanin, Ye.V., Shvartau, V.V. & Omelianenko, O.A. (2011). 100 centners club. Winter wheat varieties of the Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Singenta protection system. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

19. http://www.pogodaiklimat.ru/

20. Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T. & Konzak C.F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res., 14, No. 6, pp. 415-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x

21. Nichiporovich, A.A. (1963). About on ways to increase the productivity of photosynthesis in crops. In Photosyntesis and problems of plant productivity (pp. 5-36). Moscow: Izd-vo AN SSSR [in Russian].

22. Guide to hydrometeorological stations and posts on actinometric observations. (1973). Leningrad: Hydrometeoizdat [in Russian].

23. Zhu, X.G., Long, S.P. & Ort, D.R. (2010). Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 61, pp. 235-261. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112206

24. Dospehov, B.A. (1985). Field experiment methods. Moscow: Agropromizdat [in Russian].

25. Awal, M.A., Amin, M.R., Rhaman, M.S., Shelley, I.J. & Rahman, M.Sh. (2017). Canopy characters and light-use efficiency of some modern wheat varieties in Bangladesh. J. Agric. Ecol. Res. Int., 11, No. 1, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.9734/JAERI/2017/31744

26. Tao, Z.Q., Wang, D.M., Ma, S.K., Yang, Y.S., Zhao, G.C. & Chang, X.H. (2018). Light interception and radiation use efficiency response to tridimensional uniform sowing in winter wheat. J. Integr. Agric., 17, No. 3, pp. 566-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61715-5

27. Lollato, R.P. & Edwards, J.T. (2015). Maximum attainable wheat yield and resource-use efficiency in the southern great plains. Crop Sci., 55, No. 6, pp. 2863-2876. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.04.0215

28. Bustos, D.V., Hasan, A.K., Reynolds, M.P. & Calderini, D.F. (2013). Combining high grain number and weight through a DH-population to improve grain yield potential of wheat in high-yielding environments. Field Crops Res., 145, pp. 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.01.015

29. Molero, G., Joynson, R., Pinera-Chavez, F.J., Gardiner, L.-J., Rivera-Amado, C., Hall, A. & Reynolds, M.P. (2019). Elucidating the genetic basis of biomass accumulation and radiation use efficiency in spring wheat and its role in yield potential. Plant Biotechnol. J., 17, No. 7, pp. 1276-1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13052

30. Xie, Q., Mayes, S. & Sparkes, D.L. (2016). Preanthesis biomass accumulation of plant and plant organs defines yield components in wheat. Eur. J. Agron., 81, pp. 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.08.007

31. Li, Z.K., Jiang, X.L., Peng, T., Shi, C.L., Han, S.X., Tian, B., Zhu Z.L. &Tian, J.C. (2014). Mapping quantitative trait loci with additive effects and additive x additive epistatic interactions for biomass yield, grain yield, and straw yield using a doubled haploid population of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Gen. Molec. Res., 13, No. 1, pp. 1412-1424. https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.February.28.14

32. Furbank, R.T., Sharwood, R., Estavillo, G.M., Silva-Perez,V. & Condon, A.G. (2020). Photons to food: genetic improvement of cereal crop photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot., 71, pp. 2226-2238. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa077

33. Weber, A.P.M. & Bar-Even, A. (2019). Update: Improving the efficiency of photosynthetic carbon reactions. Plant Physiol., 179, pp. 803-812. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.01521

34. Simkin, A.J., Patricia E. Lopez-Calcagno, P.E. & Raines, C.A. (2019). Feeding the world: improving photosynthetic efficiency for sustainable crop production. J. Exp. Bot., 70, pp. 1119-1140. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery445

35. Reynolds, M.P., Pellegrineschi A. & Scovmand, V. (2005). Sink limitation to yield and biomass: a summary of some investigations in spring wheat. Ann. Appl. Biol., 146, No. 1, pp. 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.03100.x

36. Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Fournier, C., Brichet, N., Welcker, C., Suard, B. & Tardieu, F. (2016). High-throughput estimation of incident light, light interception and radiation-use efficiency of thousands of plants in a phenotyping platform. New Phytol., 212, No. 1, pp. 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14027

37. Paul, M.J., Watson, A. & Griffiths, C.A. (2020). Linking fundamental science to crop improvement through understanding source and sink traits and their integration for yield enhancement. J. Exp. Bot., 71, pp. 2270-2280. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz480