Fiziol. rast. genet. 2021, vol. 53, no. 6, 513-522, doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2021.06.513

Interaction effect in the tank mixtures of herbicides diflufenican, metribuzin and carfentrazone

Yukhymuk V.V., Radchenko M.P., Sytnyk S.K., Morderer Ye.Yu.

  • Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 31/17 Vasylkivska St., Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine

The search for new combinations of herbicides with different phytotoxic mechanisms, which spectra intersect, is one of the ways to prevent the emergence and spread of herbicide-resistant weed biotypes. A limiting factor for the complex application of certain herbicides is the effect of their interaction, as it is known that the antagonistic nature of the interaction is more common than synergistic or additive. Сonsequently, the aim of our work was to study in greenhouse conditions the effects of interaction under the complexation of herbicides of three different classes. In mixtures, there were used inhibitor of carotenoid biosynthesis diflufenican, inhibitor of electron transport in photosystem II of chloroplasts metribuzin and inhibitor of enzyme protoporphyrinogen oxidase (on the way of synthesis of chlorophyll) carfentrazone. This study was conducted for determine the possibility of using mixtures of these herbicides by application at autumn in winter wheat crops. The results of the research showed that only in the mixture of carfentrazone with metribuzin the interaction has signs of antagonism, and in other binary combinations, as well as in the ternary mixture, the interaction is additive. Taking into account the spectra of studied herbicides action and the results of their interaction effects determination, it was concluded that for autumn application in winter wheat crops are promising a mixture of diflufenican with metribuzin and triple mixture with carfenuzrazone.

Keywords: herbicides, anti-resistant mixtures of herbicides, interaction effect, antagonism, additivity, synergism

Fiziol. rast. genet.
2021, vol. 53, no. 6, 513-522

Full text and supplemented materials

Free full text: PDF  

References

1. Kraehmer, H., Almsick, A., Beffa, R., Dietrich, H., Eckes, P., Hacker, E., Hain, R., Strek, H.J., Stuebler, H. & Willms, L. (2014). Herbicides as weed control agents: State of the art: II. Recent achievements. Plant Physiology, 166, No. 3, pp. 1132-1148. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.241992

2. Vencil, W.K., Nichols, R.L., Webster, T.M., Soteres, J.K, Mallory-Smith, C., Burgos, N.R., Johnson, W.G. & McCleland, M.R. (2012). Herbicides resistance: toward an understanding of resistance development and the impact of herbicide-resistant crop. Weed Sci., Spesial Issue, pp. 2-30. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00206.1

3. Powles, S.B. & Yu, Q. (2010). Evolution in action: plant resistant to herbicides. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 61, pp. 317-347. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112119

4. Heap, I. (2021). The International Survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Retrived from www.weedscience.org.

5. Mykhalska, L. & Schwartau, V. (2017). HPAC Group 2 (legacy B) resistance barnyargrass (Echinochloa cruss-galli var. cruss-galli). Retrived from http://www.weedscience.org/details/Case.aspx?ResistID=17113

6. Diggle, A.J., Neve, P.B. & Smith, E.P. (2003). Herbicides used in combination can reduce the probability of herbicide resistance in finite weed populations. Weed Research., 43, No 5, pp. 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00355.x

7. Beckie, H. (2006). Herbicide-resistant weeds: management tactics and practices. Weed Technol., 20, No. 3, pp. 793-814. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-05-084R1.1

8. Norsworthy, J.K., Ward, S.M., Shaw, D.R., Llewellyn, R.S., Nichols, R.L., Webster, T.M., Bradley, K.W., Frisvold, G., Powles, S.T., Burgos, N.R., Witt, W.W. & Barrett, M. (2012). Reducing the risk of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendation. Weed Sci., Special Issue, pp. 31-62. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00155.1

9. Morderer, Ye.Yu. & Merezhynsky, Yu.G. (2009). Herbicides. Mechanisms of action and practice. Kyiv, Logos [in Ukrainian].

10. Zhang, J., Hamill, A. & Weaver, S. (1995). Antagonism and synergism between herbicides: trends from previos studies.Weed Technol., 9, No. 1, pp. 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00023009

11. Rafalskyj, V.V., Vashchenko, V.M. & Chajkovska, V.V. (Eds.) (2019). Addition to the list of pesticides and agrochemicals approved for use in Ukraine. Kyiv: Yunivest Media [in Ukrainian].

12. Duke, S.O. & Dayan, F.E. (2011). Comprehensive biotechnology. Bioactivity of Herbicides, pp. 23-35. Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-088504-9.00273-7

13. Rafalskyj, V.V., Vashchenko, V.M. & Chajkovska, V.V. (Eds.) (2018). List of pesticides and agrochemicals approved for use in Ukraine. Kyiv: Yunivest Media [in Ukrainian].

14. Dan Hess, F. (2000). Light-dependent herbicides: an overview. Weed Sci., 48, pp. 160-170. [0160:LDHAO]2.0.CO;2 [0160:LDHAO]2.0.CO;2

15. Ramel, F., Birtic, S., Cuine, S., Triantaphylides, C., Ravanat, J-L. & Havaux, M. (2012). Chemical quenching of singlet oxygen by carotenoids in plants. Plant. Physiol., 158, No. 3, pp. 1267-78. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.182394

16. Armel, G.R., Hall,G.J., Wilson, H.P. & Cullen, N. (2005). Mesotrione plus atrazine mixtures for control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci., 53, No. 2, pp. 202-211. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-039R

17. Armel, G.R., Wilson, H.P., Richardson, R.J., Whaley, C.M. & Hines, T.E. (2008). Mesotrione combinations with atrazine and bentazon for yellow and purple nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus) control in corn. Weed Technol., 22, No. 3, pp. 391-396. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-07-178.1

18. Abendroth, J.A., Martin, A.R. & Roeth, F.W. (2006). Plant response to combinations of mesotrione and photosystem 2 inhibitors. Weed Technol., 20, pp. 267-274. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-05-020R.1

19. Willis, J.B., Askey, S.D. & McElroy, J.S. (2007). Improved white clover control with mesotrione by tank-mixing bromoxynil, carfentrazone and simazine. Weed Technol., 21, No. 3, pp. 739-743. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-091.1

20. O'Brien, S.R., Davis, A.S. & Riechers, D.E. (2018). Quantifying resistance to isoxaflutole and mesotrione and investigating their interactions with MTZ POST in Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus). Weed Sci., 66, No 5. pp. 586-594. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.36

21. Reed,T.V., McCullough, P.E., Grey, T., Czarnota, M.A., Vencill,W.K. & Waltz, F.C. (2015). Flumioxazin Tank-Mixtures with Six Herbicides for Annual Bluegrass (Poa annua) Control in Bermudagrass. Weed Technol., 29, No. 3, pp. 561-569. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-14-00109.1

22. Ganie, Z.A., Stratman, G. & Jhala, A.J. (2015). Response of selected glyphosate-resistant broadleaved weeds to premix. Can. J. Plant Sci., 95, pp. 861-869. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps-2014-429

23. Hutchinsova, P.J.S. (2007). A comparison of flumioxazin and rimsulfuron tank mixtures for weed control in potato. Weed Technol., 21, No. 4, pp. 1023-1028. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-184.1

24. Maxwell, K. & Johnson, G.N. (2000). Chlorophyll fluorescence: a practical guide. J. Exp. Bot., 51, pp. 659-668. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659

25. Welburn, A.R. (1994). The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b as well as total carotenoids using various solvents with spectrophotometry of different resolution. J. Plant Physiol., 144, No. 3, pp. 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2

26. Colby, S.R. (1969). Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weed Sci., 15, pp. 20-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/4041058

27. Dayan, F.E. & de Zaccaro, M.L. (2012). Chlorophyll fluorescence as a marker for herbicide mechanisms of action. Pesticide Biochem. and Physiol., 102, No. 3, pp. 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2012.01.005

28. Weber, J.F., Kunz, C., Peteinatos, G.G., Santel, H.-J. & Gerhards, R. (2017). Utilization of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging technology to detect plant injury by herbicides in sugar beet and soybean. Weed Technol., 31, No. 4, pp. 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.22

29. Wakabayashi, N., Dinkova-Jostova, A.T., Holtzclaw, W.D., Kang, M., Kobayashi, A., Yamamoto, M., Kensler, T.W. & Talalay, P. (2004). Protection against Electrophile and Oxidant Stress by Induction of the Phase 2 Response: Fate of Cysteines of the Keap1 Sensor Modified by Inducers. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 101, pp. 2040-2045. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307301101

30. Silva, F.B., Costa, A.C., Pereira Alves, R.R. & Megguer, C.A. (2014). Chlorophyll fluorescence as an indicator of cellular damage by glyphosate herbicide in Raphanus sativus L. plants. Amer. J. Plant Sci., 5, No. 16, pp. 2509-2519. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.516265

31. Lee, D.L., Prisbylla, M.P., Cromartie, T.H., Dagarin, D.P., Howard, S.W., Provan, W.M., Ellis, M.K., Fraser, T. & Mutter, L.C. (1997). The discovery and structural requirements of inhibitors of p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase. Weed Sci., 45, No. 5, pp. 601-609 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500093218

32. Boger, P.J. (1996). Mode of action of herbicides affecting carotenogenesis. Pesticide Sci., 21, pp. 473-478. https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.21.473

33. Radchenko, M.P., Sychuk, A.M., Morderer, Ye.Yu. (2014). Decrease of the herbicide fenoxaprop phytotoxicity in drought conditions: the role of the antioxidant enzymatic system. J. Plant Protection Research, 54, No. 4, pp. 390-394. https://doi.org/10.2478/jppr-2014-0058

34. Radchenko, M.P., Sychuk, A.M. & Morderer, Ye.Yu. (2017). Decrease of the acetyl-CoA-carboxylase inhibiting herbicides phytotoxic action in drought condition and in mixture with other herbicides is due to the increase of antioxidant defense activity associated with plant adaptation to these stressors. Plant physiology: achievements and new directions of development. Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv: Logos [in Ukrainian].